The FIFA decision to suspend the suspension of the US national team forward Folarin Balogun following a call from President Donald Trump caused a bombshell effect in world football. This unprecedented intervention, without precedent since 1962, has split the sports community and led to a series of consequences — both on the field and beyond.

Background: what happened?

In the 1/16 final match of the 2026 World Cup against Bosnia and Herzegovina, which the US won 2:0, striker Folarin Balogun, who had already scored three goals in the tournament, received a direct red card on the 64th minute. The referee considered that he had roughly stepped on the ankle of defender Tarek Muharemovic. According to the rules, such an expulsion automatically led to a suspension for the next match — in this case, the decisive 1/8 final against Belgium.

Trump's Intervention: the call that changed everything

The subsequent development of events became unprecedented. US President Donald Trump, who, according to his own admission, initially did not know that a red card meant not only expulsion from the field but also missing the next match, personally called FIFA President Gianni Infantino.

\n
• The essence of the request: Trump asked to reconsider the incident, claiming that he did not consider this foul a violation of the rules. He called the referee's decision \"outrageous injustice\" and the referee himself \"horrible).
\n
• Argumentation: The US president emphasized that the absence of the best striker would greatly reduce the Americans' chances of success, and his suspension would be a \"big stain\" on the reputation of the entire tournament.
\n

FIFA's Reaction: an unprecedented decision

FIFA took a step unprecedented in the modern history of the World Cup. The striker was allowed to play in the match against Belgium.

\n
• Legal wording: The red card was not annulled. Referring to Article 27 of its disciplinary code, FIFA postponed the enforcement of the suspension for one year.
\n
• Conditions: If Balogun commits an analogous offense during this probationary period, the suspension will take effect.
\n
• Precedent: This is the first case since 1962 when a player was allowed to play in a match he should have missed due to a red card at the World Cup.
\n

World Reaction: anger, sarcasm and \"red line\"

The decision of FIFA sparked a storm of criticism worldwide, putting the reputation of the governing body of world football under fire.

\n
• The Belgium national team: The Belgium Football Federation said it was \"shocked\" by the decision, which \"runs counter to the regulations,\" and promised to fight for justice. The Belgians were so angry that some hot-headed people suggested they even boycott the match.
\n
• UEFA: The European Football Union made a strong statement, calling the intervention of FIFA \"unprecedented, unimaginable and unjustified,\" which \"crossed the red line.\"
\n
• The head coach of the England national team: Thomas Tuchel called this decision a dangerous precedent, posing a rhetorical question: \"Where do we draw the line?\"
\n

Outcome on the field: the US's defeat and Belgium's triumph

Contrary to expectations and hopes, Trump's intervention did not bring success to the US national team on the field.

\n
• Defeat: In the 1/8 final match, the Belgium national team routed the Americans 4:1.
\n
• Sarcasm: Belgian players openly mocked President Trump after one of the goals, performing his famous \"Trump dance.\"
\n
• Uselessness of amnesty: The \"pardoned\" Balogun was unable to make any impact and did not help his team.
\n
• Symbolism: The attempt of the US to change the course of the tournament through political means ended in a crushing defeat.
\n

Conclusion: the price of intervention

The situation with Balogun's red card became a vivid example of how political power's interference in sports can have far-reaching and extremely negative consequences. FIFA dealt a serious blow to its reputation, showing that it can go along with political leaders. European football demonstrated unity in protecting the rules of the game. And despite all efforts, the US national team suffered a crushing defeat, confirming that on the field, it is not phone calls from the White House that decide, but the skill of players. Instead of triumph, history will remember the scandal and sarcasm.

Permanent link to this publication: