Latest Information Technologies and Refereeing in Football: How Numbers Change the Game

Football is a game where passions burn not only on the field but also in the stands and in the referees' rooms. Debates about the correctness of referees' decisions have accompanied this sport since its inception. But while judges used to rely only on their own vision and intuition, today they have an entire arsenal of high-tech tools at their disposal. From video assistant referees to artificial intelligence, from smart balls to 3D scanning of players — digital technologies have burst into football rapidly and, it seems, irreversibly. They promise to make the game fairer, more transparent, and more dynamic. But is everything so simple? And where does the line between helping the referee and replacing them completely lie?

VAR: A Revolution That Began with the Screen

The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system was the harbinger of the digital era in football refereeing. Officially introduced in 2018, its roots go deeper — into numerous experiments with video replays conducted in various leagues since the 2010s. Today, VAR is not just a "referee behind the monitor." It is an entire team that monitors key moments of the match in real-time: goals, penalties, direct red cards, and incorrect player identification.

The principle of VAR is based on the fact that video assistants intervene only in cases of "clear and obvious errors" by the main referee. They do not review every episode but only those that could affect the outcome of the game. At the same time, the final decision always remains with the referee on the field — he has the right to review the moment on the monitor at the touchline and deliver the verdict himself.

However, VAR has sparked fierce debates since its inception. Supporters spoke of fairness, opponents of lost game tempo and diminished emotionalism. After all, when a scored goal is questioned and a verdict is awaited from the video room, joy is immediately replaced by tension. Nevertheless, the technology has taken root, and today no major tournament can do without VAR.

Semi-Automatic Offside: Guarding Millimeters

Offside is one of the most complex and controversial situations in football. The linesman must instantly assess the attacking player's position relative to the defender at the moment of the pass. An error of a few centimeters can cost a team a goal or, conversely, lead to an unfair cancellation of a goal. It is here that the semi-automatic offside detection technology (SAOT) comes to the rescue.

This system was first tested at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. It uses 12 specialized cameras that track 29 points on each player's body, as well as sensors inside the ball that send signals up to 500 times per second. These data allow for precise determination of whether a player was "offside" at the moment of the pass. The system automatically creates 3D graphics that are shown to spectators at stadiums and in broadcasts, making the referee's decision as transparent as possible.

However, SAOT had its drawbacks: processing 3D images took up to ten minutes, and the delay before raising the flag still remained. For the 2026 World Cup, FIFA presented an improved version — ASAOT (Advanced Semi-Automated Offside Technology). The new system can transmit information about obvious offside situations directly to the portable devices of referees on the field, allowing them to raise the flag instantly, without waiting for confirmation from the VAR room. This not only speeds up the game but also reduces the risk of injuries, as players no longer run after an obviously offside ball.

At the 2026 World Cup, the technology became even more sophisticated thanks to 3D scanning of all 1248 participating players. Digital copies of footballers created based on scanning allow for unprecedented accuracy in determining offside positions and visualizing episodes in three dimensions for spectators.

Goal-Technology: Did the Ball Cross the Line or Not?

Debates about whether the ball crossed the line of the goal have haunted football for decades. The most notorious case occurred at the 2010 World Cup, when Frank Lampard's goal against Germany was not counted, although the ball clearly went over the line. This episode became a catalyst for the introduction of the Goal-Line Technology (GLT) system for automatic goal determination.

GLT is a technology that instantly determines whether the ball has fully crossed the line of the goal. The system uses high-speed cameras installed around the goal and magnetic sensors inside the ball. As soon as the ball crosses the line, a signal is sent to the referee's watch for a second. This technology was first used at the 2014 World Cup and has since become a standard for all major tournaments. It almost eliminates human error in questions of goalkeeping and makes the game more fair.

Artificial Intelligence: The Invisible Referee

The next frontier is the use of artificial intelligence in refereeing. AI already today helps analyze game episodes, determine rule violations, and even predict the development of attacks. For example, in Russia, the AI 4 Sport platform was presented, aimed at making refereeing more objective and transparent. Many policymakers note that the use of AI makes sports transparent, more interesting, and fairer.

However, AI does not replace humans yet. Experts emphasize that technology should be a support, not a replacement for the human factor in refereeing. After all, football is not just numbers but also emotions, context, the spirit of the game. AI can help determine the moment of ball contact or player position, but the decision on whether a foul was "gross" or "unintentional" still remains with humans.

At the 2026 World Cup, artificial intelligence will not only be used for analyzing offside situations but also for creating "digital twins" of players and optimizing the work of referees. Data from RefCam also help assess whether the referee's position is optimal, allowing for the development of exercises for future generations of referees.

Helmets and Cameras: The Referee Cyborg on the Field

The 2026 World Cup in Canada, Mexico, and the United States entered history as the most technologically advanced tournament. One of the most noticeable innovations was the futuristic referee helmets, which were quickly nicknamed "Robocop equipment" on social media. This wireless communication system EarCam ensures constant communication between the referee and the linesmen, the fourth referee, and the VAR team. It allows for instant exchange of information about fouls, offside situations, and other violations.

In addition, referees wear miniature cameras RefCam weighing only 14 grams. This device allows television viewers to see the game through the eyes of the referee — to feel the speed and pressure that the referee experiences in the center of events. FIFA Referees Committee Chairman Pierluigi Collina called this technology a "tool for storytelling" that makes football more captivating and understandable to fans.

Smart Ball: Data at Every Point

The official ball of the 2026 World Cup — Adidas Trionda — is equipped with a motion sensor with a frequency of 500 Hz. This "smart ball" records every touch, pass, shot, and ricochet in real-time. Data from the sensor help VAR determine the exact moment of ball contact by a player, which is especially important when evaluating offside situations and controversial episodes in the penalty area.

This technology not only improves refereeing accuracy but also provides coaches and analysts with unique material for game analysis. Every shot, every movement of the ball becomes part of the digital history of the match.

What Next? Ethics, Speed, and Trust

Technologies in refereeing are developing rapidly, but with them, questions are also growing. The main one is where does the line between help and interference lie? On the one hand, numbers make the game fairer, reduce the number of errors and injuries. On the other hand, they kill spontaneity, slow down the pace, and give rise to new disputes: for example, why VAR intervened in one match but not in another.

Another problem is accessibility. Not all leagues and countries can afford expensive systems such as VAR or SAOT. This creates inequality: in top championships, decisions are made with the help of high technologies, while in lower divisions — by the old-fashioned method, by eye.

However, the movement forward is evident. Football is becoming more digital, more transparent, and possibly more fair. Technologies do not replace the referee; they give him new tools to make correct decisions. And as practice shows, referees, coaches, and fans are gradually getting used to the new rules of the game.

The future of refereeing lies in the symbiosis of man and machine. Artificial intelligence will help analyze, but the final decision will remain with humans. Because football is not just numbers but also emotions, the spirit, and that very "beautiful game" that cannot be confined to algorithms.
© library.ke

Permanent link to this publication: